Tuesday, February 01, 2005

The Real Tsunami

Last week, me and my friend krish had a discussion about Tsunami. While we were discussing about the natural tsunami, suddenly i asked him, what would be your reaction if it was man-made calamity. He was taken aback.
My point is, if some one wanted to do something like this, can it be done artificially? What could be the motives of doing so? why would anybody do so? the discussion went on for about an hour, till we felt bored about the topic.
Then the topic lost its relevence the next day. we did not think much about it. But today morning he came across some news article, on the same lines as what we have been discussing a week back.

The article can be found at, http://vialls.net/subliminalsuggestion/tsunami.html.
This article was interesting, intriguing, scaring and what not......
Though the article seem to be so convinced about the incident, i have few reservations over the article.

1. Will US run the risk of including more than 10,000 of its men in the operation and can still hope it to be covet operation?
2. I doubt the veracity about the involvement of Austraslian government in the whole operation.
3. Was it supposed to be a low key operation, turned into a monster or was it intented to harm the region?
4. Will anybody try some serious operations in others territory knowing the fall out of such an event?

and so on.,..... as and when i get time i had decided to fill up my reservations in this post, despite being a good read!

1 comment:

Krish said...

I dont think US run the "risk"...after all if they had done it, then they should have also known the extent of the calamity that would befell the region and they would have been completely prepared for it...its jus that others didnt know it till it happened...also some other points like, how come US was categorical about the cause even before anything can be ascertained, leaves lot of questions unanswered...As they say, Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence...U know what I mean...